We The ’Bistro

A user-generated blog featuring content produced by the mediabistro.com community 
« Back to blog

The Future of Media

Where Are We Now?

It’s no secret that recent changes in media have radically recast our world. Our lives have become data for us to slice, dice and share with other slicers and dicers. Of course, this invites certain snafus, but it also opens up whole new galaxies of innovative possibility. People are no longer willing to take their cues from Big Brothers. With the rise of social media, citizen journalism and user-generated content, everyone can be a part of the conversation—and usually about a thousand conversations at once. As we can see from the current measure of the human attention span--the ubiquitous 140 characters or less--with new formats come changes in how we absorb information. I realized that I had caught the multitasking bug when I found myself listening to a podcast while reading an article. Some claim that this sort of thinking in two directions at once is more productive, while others argue that it hinders retention. For me, it depends on the day. There are times when I can barely focus and times that I swear I could wash my hair, devour my daily news and write an article all at once. Please note, I am usually wrong about this one, a fact that becomes all too obvious when I emerge with dirty hair, no new knowledge and a page full of excrement.

What is Our Media Future?

Although everyone’s trying, nobody can predict the future of media--not even Eric Schmidt, the superhero I like to call MediaMan--but I will add one more opinion to the fray. Although everything seems to be migrating online, this doesn’t mean that the mobs chanting “print is dead” are entirely correct. People are still reading books and magazines in paper form. I’m guessing that print will take on a role akin to radio in the time of the televisual—functioning as a supplemental tool in the the annals of knowledge. I think the biggest change, however, will be in outlook. More and more, identities and ideas will be viewed as democratic and dynamic rather than static. This will lead to a climate in which the media is for the people and by the people, with all the innovation and mess that comes with that shining ideal. This trend can be seen in the new Twitter lists. People are no longer awaiting official tastemakers; they are forming their own tastes and then unleashing them on the world. It will be interesting to see the transformations these imagined communities of social media undergo. When I look into my cultural crystal ball, I see a future in which countless pieces of moveable text have replaced facts in our understanding of knowledge. Ultimately, if you’ll pardon a technologically antiquated metaphor (I’m over 25 now, practically over the hill), a given community will be defined less by its music and more by its cultural mixtape. Excuse me, I have some mixing to do.

Caroline Hagood is a poet and writer living in New York City.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments (11)

Nov 06, 2009
Melissa Breau said...
I'm in a Masters in Publishing program and I've talked to a lot of media experts about exactly where this big ship named media is going as it sails into the future.

While some sites are emerging as legitimate news sources and are doing a great job of meeting consumers media needs, I think there will always be a role for magazines - albeit a lot of them will be digital.

Specifically, large media companies will suffer (as they are) because large conglomerate media sources do not have the flexibility to continuously remake themselves in order to continue providing what consumers want and need.

Instead we'll see an exciting rise of niche magazines, small publications that focus on giving the readers a deep understanding and a significant story within their focus that readers can't find anywhere else.

Nov 06, 2009
Caroline Hagood said...
I think that's a very good analysis. The key thing you mentioned in terms of media survival will be a print or online publication's ability to continuously remake itself.
Nov 06, 2009
Kate Langenberg said...
I see the value in niche magazines as well as magazines that cater to a bigger audience. Some people want to delve deeply into a subject, and others just want an overview of many subjects.

In a time when everyone can self-publish their opinions, likes, dislikes, and interests online, we don't have to go far to find other people who share our outlook—and it's fascinating to see how communities and connections have developed as a result.

I don't think that means print publications will die, either, and I'm inclined to agree with the idea that they'll serve as supplementary tools to our other news sources. It's an interesting observation.

Nov 06, 2009
 said...
The death of print media already happened. While you might have purchased a CD this year, when was the last time you purchased a vinyl record? Getting your news on paper is over. The change to the screen has already happened (TV the first screen, the computer the second screen, mobile phone the third screen and possibly an e-reader as the fourth screen). We won't witness an overnight extinction level event like an asteroid hitting media but it already is a sudden die off. Rip Van Winkle ten years from now and the newsstands will all be closed and book stores will have morphed into book downloading hot spots. B&N and Borders are already doing this.
Nov 06, 2009
Caroline Hagood said...
Kate: The communities and connections that are being formed as a result of the changing face of media fascinate me, too.

Don: I see what you're saying, but I think the continuing success of a publication like The Economist indicates that it's not quite so black and white.

Nov 06, 2009
Melissa Breau said...
@Kate: Readers may still be interested in general interest publications; unfortunately advertisers aren't. There is a shift occurring in marketing and advertising that originated with the internet. It's the idea that it's better for a product or company to reach 30 buyers all of whom are dedicated to and interested in the type of products they produce than 50 general consumers.

This idea is part of the reason that newspapers are suffering so much. Advertisers no longer just want to pay for eyeballs - they want to pay to reach very specific demographics.

As a result, the publications that are doing well are niche publications.

@Caroline - you mention the economist, but isn't this still reaching a very targeted demographic? Think about the stereotype for an Economist reader. Although they cover a lot of varied content, they have managed to target a educated, sophisticated crowd that advertisers are still willing to pay to reach. They are still delivering content that can't be found anywhere else.

And that's the real secret to surviving in media's future - providing what no one else can. Exclusive in-depth reporting; being able to break it down for your readers or speak specifically in language and jargon that reaches out to them and is on their level.

Nov 06, 2009
Caroline Hagood said...
Melissa: It's absolutely a targeted demographic. I definitely can't make the claim that print is a booming industry right now, but I do think it's taking a more gradual downturn than some people are making it out to be. Also, and this is the most interesting part of it for me, I'm not sure that print will just die and that will be it; I sense some big changes coming on that are more complicated than a world without magazines.
Nov 07, 2009
Leighton Cooke said...
Maybe books will survive as collectable works of art. The ephemeral is sure to migrate online, and the trees will be grateful.
Nov 07, 2009
Caroline Hagood said...
now that's a great take on it.
Nov 09, 2009
 said...
So I should get out of media creation and into leather book binding?
Nov 09, 2009
Caroline Hagood said...
Not unless you want a career in comedy. But seriously, I get that print is on the decline; I just don't think it's time for the funeral yet.

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     Connect     twitter